I laughed about Signalgate until I made my own massive privacy mistake

 I laughed about Signalgate until I made my own massive privacy mistake

Published on April 7, 2025 | Category: tech

I laughed about Signalgate until I made my own massive privacy mistake

Opinion
By Lance Ulanoff published

Don't be me

Unhappy
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Raise your hand if you have accidentally sent personal or sensitive information to the wrong person. I see you out there, US National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and, if I'm being honest, I'm raising my hand right along with you.

By now, we all know the embarrassing tale of military action plans accidentally sent to an Atlantic editor who was somehow added to a secure Signal chat. It was embarrassing, but now it sounds like it might have been a shockingly relatable mistake and one we can all learn from – including me.

Essentially, a new report claims that Atlantic EIC Jeffry Goldberg's phone number was listed as an alternate contact number for a National Security spokesperson. That's possibly how Goldberg ended up in the incredibly sensitive chat. Waltz selected his spokesperson to add, but the number chosen was Goldberg's.

When I read this I had a shudder of recognition. Our contact systems are smart, fluid, and maybe a bit too fleet-footed at times. Allow me to unburden myself.

What did I just do?

A few weeks back, I was working on some personal and rather sensitive documents that I then wanted to send to my wife. I quickly compiled what I needed, opened Gmail, typed in the recipient, attached the documents, and hit send. I didn't think much of it until my wife quizzed me about the whereabouts of said documents.

I knew I sent them, but I wondered if they'd gotten stuck in the outbox – a rare occurrence that would usually indicate a network issue. Nope, the email showed up in Sent – and then I noticed something horrifying. I had not sent the documents to my wife. Instead, they went to a random business contact whose name and email address also started with "L."

Gmail had autocompleted the address with the first matching email address, and I never looked twice. It was a whopper of a mistake – not national security level, but still big in my world. It was too late to recall the message, so I sent a follow-up to the contact, begging them not to open the doc and delete the email.

It was not my best moment, and I again had a twinge of empathy for Waltz.

Slow down, dude

The reality is that our social media, communications, and email systems are not there to ensure that you use the right phone numbers, handles, and email addresses.

Instead, they go for speed and, in email, autocompleted addresses, which can help you find long or forgotten ones, can be quite useful. But they're also a little dangerous.

Unless you're a salesperson with a customer relationship management (CRM) system, you probably don't spend much time managing the details of any contact.

You might only have an email address. Maybe only a first name. Your contacts may have duplicates with different and old email addresses and phone numbers (the startup Sunshine Contacts is supposed to address some of this).

You might get a new number for a contact and add that. On my iPhone, when I add or update a contact's info, there is a moment of trepidation as I try to figure out if this is a new contact or details for one I already have on my iPhone.

We don't spend enough time, I think, making sure our contact databases on our iPhones and mail systems are up to date, and perhaps we're not being careful enough about our contacts across all our systems.

Caught in a random loop

Think about how many times a random number pops up on your phone with a text or call. Usually, it has no name attached, and your phone is of little use in helping you ferret out if this is a known or unknown person.

For instance, my iPhone sometimes indicates that something is potential SPAM, but it does not do this often enough.

Perhaps because I talk to so many people through Slack or text, I barely know anyone's phone number by heart (I'm even worse with email addresses). It's no wonder I don't know the difference between known and unknown numbers.

I also have way too many email addresses in my system and need a smarter way of cleaning and managing them. I cannot afford to (again 🤦🏼‍♂️) accidentally send sensitive info to the wrong place.

AI to the rescue?

Here's a place where AI can help. If Google Gemini knows I'm sending personal documents, it'll also know not to randomly slide in a business contact's email address. Instead, the list of potential recipients would be narrowed to just my personal contacts and maybe only those identified as family members.

I could always add in others I need, but I do it without Gmail helpfully autocompleting them. And if Siri and Apple Intelligence ever get as smart as promised, it might be able to know that the Signal or Whatsapp chat you're about to start is too sensitive to include "Jeffrey" from the Atlantic.

The lesson, if there is one, is that we all need to verify every number and email address we include in a thread or group chat. Compile the list, double-check it against your contact database, and then check it again.

You think it can't happen to you until you create that WhatsApp chat group to trash-talk your job and realize that someone accidentally added the boss. Or you send a private email to someone who should never receive it.

Take it from me: don't assume it can't happen to you, and do all you can to make sure it never does.

You might also like

  • 5 things I want from the iPhone 17 – or I'm out and back to .
  • Signalgate explained: what is Signal, and how secure is ...
  • This iPhone feature has been blamed for the Signalgate fiasco – here’s how to avoid your own group chat nightmare

Get daily insight, inspiration and deals in your inbox

Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.

By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.
TOPICS
Lance Ulanoff
Lance Ulanoff
Editor At Large

A 38-year industry veteran and award-winning journalist, Lance has covered technology since PCs were the size of suitcases and “on line” meant “waiting.” He’s a former Lifewire Editor-in-Chief, Mashable Editor-in-Chief, and, before that, Editor in Chief of PCMag.com and Senior Vice President of Content for Ziff Davis, Inc. He also wrote a popular, weekly tech column for Medium called The Upgrade.

Lance Ulanoff makes frequent appearances on national, international, and local news programs including Live with Kelly and Mark, the Today Show, Good Morning America, CNBC, CNN, and the BBC. 

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.

More about software
An image of the Apple emoji keyboard on an iPhone

Apple has introduced 8 new emojis with iOS 18.4 - here they are, ranked from best to worst

BenQ PD2700U in a home office showing the Windows background

Windows 11’s rumored Start menu redesign could mean it eats up a huge chunk of desktop space for some users – although it can be tamed

Latest
Racks of servers inside a data center.

Does Microsoft know something we don't? Tech giant cools down on AI data center investment as another report claims company pullbacks

See more latest
Most Popular
A circle of laptops connected to a cloud symbol.
Strategies for measuring success and unlocking business value in cloud adoption
Cloud, networking and internet
The digital bedrock of a business holds the key to innovation with intelligence
A hand reaching out to touch a futuristic rendering of an AI processor.
Four tips to identify AI solutions that solve real business problems
Close-up hands counting money American dollars
Can DevOps solve banking apps’ payday meltdowns?
Corsair Katar Elite Wireless on a colorful mouse pad
I'm cutting cords in 2025 - here's why I trust wireless hardware (and why you should too)
Nespresso white chocolate and strawberry coffee pods
I didn't think white chocolate and strawberry coffee would work, but Nespresso's new pods proved me wrong
Microsoft Copilot Vision
Microsoft Copilot is putting eyes on your screen, and I don't mind it – as long as it stays private
a person's hands holding a black PC gaming handheld
I wanted Nintendo to wow me with the Switch 2 – instead it’s made me hug my ROG Ally X handheld even closer
I've waited years for Super Mario Odyssey 2, and without it, I'm a bit disappointed with my Nintendo Switch 2 preorder
Copilot April 2025 Update
I didn’t care about Copilot, but this massive upgrade could make Microsoft’s AI the personal assistant I’ve always wanted

Related Articles

Spotify is about to be flooded with AI-made ads, and I wonder if it will make much of a difference to businesses

Spotify’s new AI-powered ad tool may not be the solution they claim....

Read More
CinemaCon 2025 live – first Avatar 3 reaction, juicy Fantastic Four news,

CinemaCon 2025 is officially underway – here are all new movie announc...

Read More
NYT Wordle today — answer and my hints for game #1385, Friday, April 4

Looking for Wordle hints? I can help. Plus get the answers to Wordle t...

Read More